tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8377446.post113524510991374732..comments2024-03-05T17:55:58.806+00:00Comments on Nanny Knows Best: Nanny Bans Carols IIKen Frosthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13568488818950912374noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8377446.post-1135326696405570612005-12-23T08:31:00.000+00:002005-12-23T08:31:00.000+00:00If the cops are like ours in NZ, they always cauti...If the cops are like ours in NZ, they always caution against using your lawful right to perform a citizen's arrest.<BR/><BR/>I suppose it's OK when busting the enemies of nanny state- just don't shoot a burglar in your own home...Oswald Bastablehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11828229103486326473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8377446.post-1135274097036227822005-12-22T17:54:00.000+00:002005-12-22T17:54:00.000+00:00spiv, pretty much my thought processes as well.Why...spiv, <BR/><BR/>pretty much my thought processes as well.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Why does an image of the child catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang keep popping into my head?<BR/><BR/>There is an easier solution to this though - just ban children. Solves all sorts of problems at with minimal need for hundreds of unenforceable rules and regulations. Cuts (no pun intended) red tape as well.<BR/><BR/>Also solves the education crisis, most bullying problems and paedophilia (at least in the lands of the UK.)<BR/><BR/>Under age drinking and smoking would be a thing of the past and we could shut down the TV stations for at least 50% of every 24hr period.<BR/><BR/>The pavements and roads would be safer places to be.<BR/><BR/>The money saved by not havibng to raise the little ... er, children, could be ploughed back into the economy safe in the knowledge that we might as well spend it since there would, after a generation or so, be no family to inherit any remainder.<BR/><BR/>Obviously we would need to dominate some other countries to be able to fund our pensions and to have ready locations to recruit the most suitable young people (Say minimum age 21? Or maybe 25?) for immigration to continue the success. But that does not seem to be a problem, in principle, today since so many wish to come so I can't see it being a major difficulty.<BR/><BR/>Any thoughts? Have I missed something?<BR/><BR/><BR/>GrantAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8377446.post-1135273420525016782005-12-22T17:43:00.000+00:002005-12-22T17:43:00.000+00:00More nanny-subverting ideas here!<A HREF="http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2005/12/330412.html" REL="nofollow">More nanny-subverting ideas here!</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8377446.post-1135246070200682712005-12-22T10:07:00.000+00:002005-12-22T10:07:00.000+00:00Just shows how gutless Nanny and her 'new labour' ...Just shows how gutless Nanny and her 'new labour' minions are when it comes to the public ridicule of her rididulous laws.<BR/><BR/>Do we assume that no £20,000 fines are going to be dished out for this not being a properly licenced 'event'??<BR/><BR/>And as regards the 'citizens arrest' of minors, as I have not had a police check done on me, so could well be a paedophile in the eyes of Nanny, am I not inviting trouble on myself by taking a youngster into custody? Once again, we have a complete lack of joined up thinking by Nanny's clowns (and probably a lack of joined up writing as well!!!)<BR/><BR/>Hearty congratulations go to all those who sang at the carol concert. At least some of Nanny;s citizens are prepared to stand up and be counted.spivhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13404364711838124485noreply@blogger.com