Nanny Knows Best

Nanny Knows Best
Dedicated to exposing, and resisting, the all pervasive nanny state that is corroding the way of life and the freedom of the people of Britain.

Friday, March 07, 2025

The Toothbrush Tyranny: Government’s Latest Nanny State Absurdity



In a move that proves the government has officially run out of real problems to solve, bureaucrats have decided that your kids can’t be trusted to brush their own teeth. Yes, you read that right: supervised teeth brushing is now a thing, courtesy of the overpaid busybodies who think they know better than you how to raise your own children. Welcome to the nanny state’s latest obsession—dental micromanagement.
 
Picture this: a gaggle of government-approved toothbrush monitors, armed with clipboards and sanctimonious grins, hovering over five-year-olds like drill sergeants at boot camp. “Up, down, circles—don’t miss the molars, Timmy!” Meanwhile, parents—those incompetent fools who’ve somehow kept their kids alive this long—are relegated to the sidelines, deemed unfit to oversee something as complex as a two-minute scrub with a plastic stick and some paste. It’s not just insulting; it’s a parody of governance.
 
The justification? “Public health.” Apparently, cavities are the new plague, and the state must swoop in to save the day because, clearly, no one thought to teach kids dental hygiene before 2025. Forget the fact that tooth decay rates have been dropping for decades thanks to fluoride, better diets, and—shockingly—parents doing their jobs. No, the government insists we need a taxpayer-funded army of molar minders to ensure little Johnny doesn’t sneak a half-assed brush past the system. What’s next? Supervised handwashing? Mandatory flossing quotas?
 
This isn’t about health—it’s about control. The same clowns who can’t fix potholes or keep bridges from collapsing now want to stick their noses (and probably their unwashed hands) into your bathroom routine. They’re not content with regulating your guns, your gas stoves, or your light bulbs—now they’re after your kid’s toothbrush. It’s the ultimate power grab: if they can dictate something as mundane as brushing, what’s off-limits?
 
And let’s talk cost. Every one of these dental despots needs a salary, benefits, and probably a shiny badge that says “Tooth Fairy Enforcement Division.” Add in the training programs—because you can’t just trust any schmuck to wield a timer and a stern look—and the inevitable “oversight committees” to oversee the overseers. Who pays for this? You do, sucker. That’s right, your tax dollars, already stretched thin by inflation and endless government bloat, are now funding a toothbrush gestapo while schools still can’t afford books.
 
The real kicker? Kids aren’t even that bad at brushing. Sure, some smear toothpaste around like it’s finger paint, but most figure it out with a little parental nudge. Studies—like the ones the government conveniently ignores—show that basic education and access to dental care do the trick. But why solve a problem efficiently when you can turn it into a bloated bureaucracy instead? This isn’t prevention; it’s performance art for politicians who want to look like they’re “doing something.”
 
Then there’s the creep factor. Do you really want some stranger leaning over your kid, peering into their mouth, barking orders? In an age where parents are already paranoid about who’s around their children, the state thinks it’s a grand idea to insert itself into one of the most personal daily routines. Call it what it is: invasive. Next, they’ll be installing cameras in your kitchen to make sure you’re cutting the crusts off sandwiches correctly.
 
The irony is, this is the same government that lectures us about “empowerment” and “independence.” Yet here they are, treating kids like incapable drones and parents like negligent morons. If you want to teach responsibility, let kids brush their damn teeth and deal with the consequences—a dentist visit or two never killed anyone. But no, the nanny state prefers coddling over competence, control over common sense.
 
So, parents, brace yourselves. Hide your toothbrushes, lock your bathrooms, and tell your kids to smile pretty—Big Brother’s coming for their pearly whites. And when the inevitable rebellion hits—because nothing says “teen angst” like a government-mandated hygiene routine—don’t say we didn’t warn you. In the meantime, maybe we should all just gargle some whiskey and call it a day. At least that’s still legal. 
 
For now!

www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts

Friday, February 07, 2025

Cretinous Fuckwittery!


 

When you allow mentally ill people to set the rules for everyone else, you end up living in an insane asylum!


www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts

Thursday, February 06, 2025

The Science Museum's Descent into Absurdity: Lego Bricks Have Penises




In what can only be described as the pinnacle of woke nonsense, the London Science Museum has launched what seems to be a self-parody with its self-guided tour, "Seeing Things Queerly." This tour, in an astonishing leap of illogic, claims that Lego bricks, yes, those colourful blocks beloved by children and adults alike, can be "anti-LGBT." How, you might ask in disbelief? By having parts that "mate" with each other, apparently designated as male and female, thereby reinforcing heteronormativity.

Let's unpack this utter drivel. According to the museum's guide, the top of the Lego brick with sticking out pins is considered "male," while the bottom with holes is "female." The act of connecting these bricks? That's "mating." If this sounds like a stretch, it's because it is. It's not just a stretch; it's a leap into the stratosphere of idiocy.

This isn't education; this is indoctrination. The Science Museum, once a bastion of scientific inquiry and enlightenment, has now become a stage for the most bizarre and unfounded gender ideology. It's as if the museum has decided that instead of teaching children about physics, chemistry, or biology, it would rather confuse them with pseudo-intellectual garbage about toys and gender politics.

The museum's assertion that Lego bricks perpetuate heteronormative structures lacks any semblance of empirical evidence. No credible study, research, or even a casual survey of Lego users would support this ludicrous claim. It's a narrative spun out of thin air, fuelled by the current obsession with seeing gender in every nook and cranny of daily life, including, apparently, in children's toys.

But let's be clear, this isn't just about mislabelling toys. This is about the broader, more sinister trend of institutions bending over backward to cater to a fringe ideology that sees everything through the lens of identity politics. It's about transforming educational spaces into battlegrounds for ideological wars, where facts take a backseat to feelings and unfounded assertions.

The backlash has been swift and well-deserved. Critics, including the charity Sex Matters, have rightfully branded these claims as "completely bonkers." It's not just about disagreeing with the interpretation; it's about recognising the profound disconnect from reality that such statements represent. Fiona McAnena from Sex Matters pointed out the absurdity by stating, "The idea that Lego is 'heteronormative' because the blocks are described as 'male' and 'female' is ridiculous."

Moreover, this fiasco has not gone unnoticed on social media platforms like X, where posts reflect a sentiment of disbelief and ridicule towards the museum's stance. The general consensus seems to be that this is a new low for what should be a respected institution.

What's particularly galling is the implication that children, playing innocuously with Lego bricks, are somehow being indoctrinated into heteronormative views through the simple act of building. It's an insult to the intelligence of both children and adults to suggest that the mechanics of a toy designed for creativity and learning are inherently political or sexual.

The Science Museum needs to return to its roots—promoting science, not pseudoscience. It should be about expanding minds with knowledge, not shrinking them with baseless ideological assertions. If the museum wants to engage in discussions about gender and sexuality, it should do so with factual, evidence-based exhibitions, not by twisting the narrative of a toy loved across generations.

In conclusion, the Science Museum's claim about Lego bricks is not just a misstep; it's a full-frontal assault on common sense, science, and the sanctity of play. It's time for institutions like these to stop playing the fool in the court of public opinion and start focusing on what they're supposed to do: educate, inspire, and perhaps, most importantly, keep their exhibits grounded in reality.
 
Better not tell them about electrical lugs have male and female parts!

www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts

Thursday, January 23, 2025

Nanny Thinks Old People are Too Expensive


 


www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts

Wednesday, January 22, 2025

WEF Nanny Admits Defeat!


 


www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Nanny's Orwellian Crackdown: Turning Pubs into Free Speech Gulags

 
In what can only be described as a descent into a modern-day Orwellian nightmare, Labour's recent employment reforms have taken aim at one of the last bastions of unfiltered British culture: the pub. The Labour government, with its newfound zeal for micromanaging the minutiae of everyday life, has introduced policies that effectively transform local watering holes into no-go zones for free speech. Here's why this should alarm every Brit who cherishes the right to a good, old-fashioned debate over a pint.

From Cheers to Censorship

The heart of the issue lies in Labour's reinterpretation of harassment laws within the confines of pubs. Under the guise of protecting workers, the new employment rights bill mandates that landlords play the role of "banter police," surveilling conversations to prevent any potentially offensive remarks. This means that discussions on topics like politics, religion, or even football could be curtailed if someone finds them "harassing." Imagine the scene: two blokes at the bar, one a staunch supporter of Brexit, the other a remainer, both now needing to whisper their opinions lest they offend someone or, worse, the pub staff.

EHRC's Alarm

Even the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), not typically known for its libertarian stance, has raised red flags over these measures. The EHRC warns that Labour's approach risks severely curtailing freedom of expression, which is supposedly a fundamental right in this country. This is not about protecting the vulnerable from real harassment but about pre-emptively silencing any conversation that might stir controversy, thereby stripping pubs of their role as communal discussion forums.

A Culture of Fear

The implications are vast and deeply troubling. Pub landlords, already grappling with the economic fallout from various policies, now face the additional burden of policing speech. This doesn't just infringe on the rights of the patrons; it places an unfair onus on landlords, potentially leading to fewer people daring to voice their opinions for fear of repercussions. The chilling effect this has on free speech cannot be overstated. Pubs, which have historically been places where ideas are exchanged freely, now risk becoming sterile environments where only safe, government-approved topics are discussed.

The Irony of Labour's Legacy

It's a cruel irony that Labour, a party with roots in workers' rights and free speech, now champions policies that could very well be Orwell's "1984" in action. By attempting to regulate speech in such an intimate setting as the pub, Labour reveals its true colours: not as a guardian of liberty but as an architect of control. This move isn't just about protecting workers; it's about controlling the narrative, about ensuring that only the "right" kind of speech is heard, thereby eroding the very essence of British pub culture.

A Call to Arms

The British public must see this for what it is: an assault on the freedoms they hold dear. The government's role should not be to dictate what can be said over a pint but to protect the right to say it. The Labour Party needs to be reminded that freedom of speech is not a luxury but a necessity, especially in the informal settings where ideas are freely exchanged. If we allow this precedent to stand, we're not just losing our pubs; we're losing our voice.

In conclusion, Labour's employment reforms are a stark reminder that when government oversteps to regulate personal interactions, the cost is often our most cherished liberties. The time to speak out is now, before the only conversation left in pubs is the silent nod of agreement with the status quo. Let's not allow our local to become a place where freedom once rang but now lies silenced under the heavy hand of state control.



www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts