It seems that McDonald’s is so worried about the health etc of its customers, that it is considering breathalysing customers who want to use the fast food outlet in Rose Crescent Cambridge.
Joseph Keegan, from Cambridgeshire County Council ‘s alcohol action team, told the Independent that they were trying to stop people “putting their health at risk”.
He said every person turned away from a venue would be offered a card with information about risks and cutting down on alcohol abuse.
It is ironic that people who are allegedly "drunk" will be denied food, given that (as far as I understand it) "experts" always recommend that you eat something when drinking (so as to soak up the booze).
It is also ironic, on election day, that whilst a fast food outlet ponders allowing people in to buy a burger that people are allowed to vote when drunk/stoned!
Visit The Orifice of Government Commerce and buy a collector's item.
Visit The Joy of Lard and indulge your lard fantasies.
Show your contempt for Nanny by buying a T shirt or thong from Nanny's Store.
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
Why not really indulge yourself, by doing all the things that Nanny really hates? Click on the relevant link to indulge yourselves; Food, Bonking, Gifts and Flowers, Groceries
Good grief.....Is there no end to this stupidity. Security staff at a glorified cafe? Whatever next! One way, I suspect to get a drunk person to kick off would be to deny them entry to the glorified cafe and to patronise them with Nanny's anti booze card.
ReplyDeleteMucky D's cannot be put on my list of businesses I bocott because they're already on it for other reasons, not that I would put one of their products into my body anyway.
In my opinion, Nanny needs to think about why so many people try to escape reality by being stoned on booze or narcotics.....Could it be Nanny's brave new world is just crap and people need to escape it even if it's only for a few hours?
Tonk said: "Mucky D's cannot be put on my list of businesses I bocott because they're already on it for other reasons, not that I would put one of their products into my body anyway."
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree with you more! I cannot boycott them either, as I never go there, I would guess for similar reasons to yourself. In any case, I was under the impression that it was the job of the police to breathalyse those they suspect of being over the limit, not security guards working for fast food outlets! I can imagine the response of some individuals if they should be approached for this purpose: it ends with the word "OFF!" (It may also involve a smack in the mouth!).
(Shakes head despairingly).
Already happened I'm afraid..
ReplyDeletehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3070251/Teacher-25-person-turned-away-McDonald-s-failing-breathalyser-test.html
Words fail me! (Again!)
ReplyDelete"Ah, Mr Already agressive... please blow into this..." Yup, thats going to be a BIG hit and going to stop problems completely... not.
ReplyDeleteIn retaliation, can pubs ban entry to smelly fatties that have spent their lives gorging on Mcshite?
ReplyDelete