In case you didn't know (god, I sound like a health and safety droid) the picture is a fake. It's been 'photoshopped'. Here is the original.
Have I been conned?Ken
I know this might sound like a daft question, but the date on the so-called 'original' is 30th July. I received a copy of the so-called ' fake on 26th July. So how can the 'fake' have been in circulation BEFORE the original was taken? I'm confused!!
Hmmm...curiouser and curiouser. I too first saw the Photoshop job on 26 July. But don't you think the original says 30 June 2003?
Curiouser and curiouser said Alice!Fake or not, it very amusing.Ken