Well Done Boris!

The team at Nanny Knows Best would like to offer Boris Johnson, and the other victorious Tory candidates, hearty congratulations for giving Nanny's troglodytes a sound kicking in the local and mayoral elections.

One step further towards kicking the loathsome Nanny government, that for the last decade has been destroying the fabric of British society, out of office.

However, let the Tories and Boris not forget that they are mortal; let them also be aware that Tory councils can, on occasions, be as useless as Labour ones. I cite my own council of Croydon as a prime example.

In honour of Boris's victory I invite you all to read Nanny Bans Boris, which was published back in 2004 on this site.

Visit The Orifice of Government Commerce and buy a collector's item.

Visit The Joy of Lard and indulge your lard fantasies.

Show your contempt for Nanny by buying a T shirt or thong from Nanny's Store.

www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Celebrate the joy of living with champagne. Click and drink!

Why not really indulge yourself, by doing all the things that Nanny really hates? Click on the relevant link to indulge yourselves; Food, Bonking, Toys, Gifts and Flowers, Groceries

Ideas Above His Station

Clearly Ken Leninspart (Mayor of London) has got ideas above his station.

His recent decree that he will impose a "congestion charge" of £25 per "4*4", in order to limit noxious fumes and "save the environment", may all be very well and good were his role in life as London's Mayor to save the planet.

However, it is not.

The aim of the "congestion charge" is to reduce the amount of traffic in London. A "4*4" takes up the same room, more or less, as any other car.

This £25 charge goes beyond the concept of "congestion" control.

Mayor Ken, like all of Nanny's acolytes, has gotten beyond himself.

That of course does not matter to Nanny, £25 is a nice little earner!

De-evolution

As we all know Nanny loves the idea of devolution, despite the hornets' nest that this policy stirs up.

She has pro actively encouraged Scottish and Welsh devolution, English regional assemblies and created city mayors in certain parts of England (Ken Livingstone being the living monument to Nanny's stupidity) whose role in life seems questionable.

However, Nanny's policy of devolution does not stop there.

She has now started on a policy of de-evolution, whereby the citizens of Britain are proactively encouraged to de-evolve back to a tribal stoneage state.

Don't believe me?

On Monday night there were two programmes on the TV (ITV and Channel 4), covering a similar topic, one analysed why women felt unsafe on the streets at night and the other asked why kids kill.

In a nutshell here's a few select highlights:

• Kids kill because, and this "takes the biscuit", they are bored (this from the mouths of the kids themselves!)



• Kids (8 years and upwards) are reverting to tribalism, via their gangs.



• Kids are imposing territorial boundaries on themselves and others. Those who stray into each others "pissing fields" are attacked or killed.



• One hapless female reporter very bravely approached a gang of "teens" (the youngest being 11) at night, who were hanging around on the street outside a shop. Their faces were completely covered with zip up hoods, you could not even see their eyes.
  
  She asked them to consider that maybe their appearance frightened people. After a few grunts and mumbles, the gang became aggressive and started throwing stones and bottles (how very stoneage!), they then used their mobiles to bring around 20 of their mates into the fray.
  
  Such was the poor quality of the diction of the "kids" interviewed, that the programme makers had to use subtitles in order for the hapless viewer to make sense of what these "kids" were saying.

There are a few blindingly obvious questions, two of which being:

1 Why the hell are 11 year olds being allowed to run around the streets at night like savage animals? Why are their parents allowing this?

2 What the hell has the state been teaching these kids in school, if they are unable to even form a coherent word/sentence without the need of subtitles?

I have already noted on this site my views on what needs to be done, re imposing a form of house arrest for the entire family of these savages (sans TV, mobiles phones, DVD, CD etc) and cutting benefits.

It seems to me that unless this issue is addressed now, both in the schools and via a "house arrest" scheme, we will find ourselves living cheek by jowl with savage stoneage tribes.

Nanny's policy of de-evolution needs to be stopped now.

Nanny Reins in Rampaging Octopus

Today sees the launch of Nanny’s much leaked White Paper on Health.

In this “worthy tome” she sets out her agenda for banning smoking, junk food and the other sins of personal pleasure that she despises.

Now much has been, and will be, written about the ban that will proposed on smoking in public places where there is prepared food. There will doubtless be a splendidly robust discussion as to what constitutes prepared food. We will return to that in future articles.

However, what has not been widely reported is this “wee gem”.

Nanny’s special friend Ken “Octopus” Livingstone (Mayor of London), who has his tentacles in all aspects of London life, has suffered a major rebuke; and has had to be reined in by Nanny’s Health Enforcer John “Twenty Rothmans a Day” Reid (funny how Nanny, and many of her friends were smokers isn’t it?).

You see, Nanny’s Octopus was keenly backing plans to give all of London’s 32 councils’ powers to ban smoking in all public places. Enforcer John’s plans do permit smoking, as said, in licensed public places where there is no prepared food; however, he will not be permitting councils to issue their own banning order.

Why is this?

Well, believe it or not, Nanny is getting a little worried about people accusing her of creating a “Nanny State”. It seems that she is beginning to detect a sea change in peoples’ moods, namely that they do not like to be nannied.

If www.nannyknowsbest.com has contributed in anyway to Nanny’s feeling of discomfort, then I can only say I am proud of that achievement (albeit a minor one); and hope to continue to discomfort, and annoy, her for the foreseeable future.