Nanny Knows Best

Nanny Knows Best
Dedicated to exposing, and resisting, the all pervasive nanny state that is corroding the way of life and the freedom of the people of Britain.

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Nanny's Segregated Swimming Pool III

Nanny's Segregated Swimming PoolWell lookey here folks, Croydon Council actually sent me their official press response to the media stories about their segregated swimming pool.

Rather a surprise, considering that they never respond to the issues that I raise in www.croydoniscrap.com. Then again, the swimming pool story was featured by several large media organs (can I say organ?), so they were rather forced to say something about it.

Anyhoo, at the end of this article you can read the full text of their press release. The Croydon Council spin doctors have made a good effort to spin the story around, and to try to present it as a storm in a tea cup. Rather a nice touch to use the title "Single Gender Swimming Lessons".

See, it's nothing to do with religion; it's a sex issue!

So that's alright then isn't?

Er...no it's not.

The trouble is, if you read it carefully, it doesn't quite stack up:
  • Is not the provision of single sex sessions, in a public facility (as opposed to a private members only club), discriminatory?


  • Why do women or men need to swim separately?


  • The title and tone of the media release would have you believe that this was merely a gender issue. However, if this is only a "gender thing", why do the sessions require a greater level of covering-up than would be the case during public opening hours?


  • Why, if this is only a "gender thing", are the "Single Gender Sessions" run in conjunction with Norbury Islamic Academy? (Scroll down to the bottom of this page from the pool's website).


  • Croydon Council would have you believe that the sessions (which have been going on for a year) are outside of the normal opening hours of the pool, and as such no member of the public is being inconvenienced by this. However, it seems that they are being a tad disingenuous when they say that it is outside of normal hours. It may now be outside of normal hours, but the opening hours of the pool have been shortened (see the pool's website updated December 2006).

    Sarah Fellows, a pool regular is quoted as saying:

    "I take my kids all the time

    but I did notice they had introduced the men-only Muslim afternoon

    a while back though they've now changed the times as well
    ."

    In fact, if you go to an old version of the pool's website, you can see that the swimming pool was open on Sunday May 2006 up to 17:45, which was later than it is now. However, the male only sessions now start at 16:45. The pool opening times on Sunday have been shortened, thus it is perfectly "correct" for the council to say that the sessions are now outwith the normal hours.


  • Why, if this is a "gender only thing", do people need to adhere to a dress code.
Why does the council need to try to spin the story in this manner? The council, if it really believes in its policy of providing Muslims with separate sessions, should have the balls to say so. At least people would respect them for saying, and doing, what they believe.

This policy, and the spin reaction, helps no one. Contact details for Croydon Council are in the original article on this site.

Full Text of Press Release

Single Gender Swimming sessions at Thornton Heath pool


Croydon Council is monitoring attendances at its weekly, single gender swimming sessions that have been held at Thornton Heath pool throughout the last year. Attendances have averaged 250 each weekend. The sessions have been organised to help ensure that as many local people as possible are able to make use of the facilities. Those attending have also been able to use the fitness suite and sports hall.

Contrary to national press reports over the weekend, sessions are open to all faiths. The sessions for women are held on Saturday afternoon (6.45pm - 8.45pm) and the sessions for men are held on Sunday afternoons (4.45pm - 6.45pm). The dress code during these sessions requires a greater level of covering-up than would be the case during public opening hours.

Provision of the sessions is in line with the council's policy of ensuring leisure facilities in the borough are accessible to the whole community. They are particularly appreciated by members of the Muslim community as well as other local people who feel more comfortable attending single gender sessions.

Croydon is in no way unique in offering such sessions to minority communities outside public opening hours and they have operated with the consent and understanding of all pool users since their introduction in November 2005.

7 comments:

  1. "Croydon Council would have you believe that the sessions (which have been going on for a year) are outside of the normal opening hours of the pool, and as such no member of the public is being inconvenienced by this."

    Ermm . . . Nanny must really believe that we are all morons. Let's see how this rationale would work in other contexts:

    There is no discrimination in our bus service. All of the seats in the "normal section" are available to everyone. The ones in the front are for whites only.

    There is no discrmination in our hiring policies. All of the "normal" jobs are open to anyone. However, the ones in management are only open to whites.

    There is no discrimination in our school admissions policy. All of the "normal" slots are open to anyone. The others are reserved for . . . (oops, sorry, this one is still being debated in the courts.)

    If the public is paying for the pool to be open and used during certain normally scheduled hours, then the public should be able to use the pool during those hours.

    The only way that this policy might be acceptable, would be if swimmers with special clothing needs paid from their own pockets the full cost of operating the facility during those "closed" swimming sessions. That itself might still be problematic, however.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We seem to be going backwards - Apartheid (sp?)being enforced by local councils in the swimming pool - the start of a slippery slope we're on, segregation in our inner cities and non integration of our immigrant population is going to eventually split our country into us and them. For all Government bangs on about integration etc - this is flying in the face of their recent 'integration' rhetoric. It's like muslim only shortlists for mp's, muslim only shortlists for police - can you see where it's all going? What happened to equal rights? it all seems to be geared towards the muslim population just now.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Integration has never really worked. Look at Ireland for heaven's sake. The Scots and the Welsh only pretend to be integrated - when it suits them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. helen highwater7:12 AM

    Erm, does anyone know which Muslim countries have Christian only swimming pool sessions?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Regardless of the rights and wrongs of having the single sex swimming sessions, what I don't understand is how the council rationalises the dress code for men. If the session is, as they say, open to men of all faiths, then surely the muslim men can cover up as they feel they are required to do by religious dictat, but other men can wear normal swimming trunks if they wish. I can see a council saying that the genitals must be covered - ie no nude swimming, but after that rule it is ridiculous to demand that non-muslims adhere to a dress code which is specific to a particular branch of muslim ideology.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Do the Muslem women have to swim in the black long gown?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have no qualms over sharing a swimming pool with other members of the public howsover they are dressed (or not as the case may be).

    If Muslims cannot abide the sight of normal swimmers in their Speedos - the answer is simple:
    1.) Go and live in a Muslim country, and/or
    2.) Do what I've done and spend two years cold-hardening so they can swim outdoors all year round. Plenty of deserted beaches in winter so they'll have a whole sea to themselves.

    Simple, isn't it?

    Pete

    ReplyDelete