Much to my amusement, after years of telling us that fast food was bad for us, Nanny has now come to the conclusion that sit down meals in restaurants are in fact more calorie laden that fast food.
Therefore we must conclude the fast food is in fact good for us!
Nanny's drones have concluded that the calorie content of meals in UK restaurants is "excessive" and sit-down restaurants are unhealthier than fast-food chains, BMJ research suggests.
Health "experts" say meals should not exceed 600 calories, but in this study they averaged 1,033 in restaurants and 751 in fast-food chains.
Why should a meal be limited to 600 calories?
Who are these people to tell us that?
University of Liverpool researchers analysed thousands of meals from places like Hungry Horse and McDonald's.
They said their findings were a cause for concern.
It is clear that Nanny will not only continue trying to shut down fast food outlets, but will now also try to the the same to sit down establishments.
My conclusion is that these people shou;d fuck off and let us get on with our lives!
Visit The Orifice of Government Commerce and buy a collector's item.
Visit The Joy of Lard and indulge your lard fantasies.
Show your contempt for Nanny by buying a T shirt or thong from Nanny's Store.
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
Why not really indulge yourself, by doing all the things that Nanny really hates? Click on the relevant link to indulge yourselves; Food, Bonking, Gifts and Flowers, Groceries
Amen to your concluding line. A grown male adult needs at least 2000 kilocalories of food per day. More if working at a manual occupation. So university of Liverpool is taking bollox.
ReplyDelete