Dear Mr @sajidjavid
— CheapAccounting.co.uk & TaxBootCamp.co.uk (@cheapaccounting) October 25, 2021
It's been 6 months and one day since my last Covid vaccine
I'm over 50 (I know I don't look it!)
Tried to book appointment but Booking System tells me I can't
Please help me to do the right thing & get my next Covid vaccine thank you #CovidBooster
As I noted yesterday, there is a coordinated campaign by FAKE SAGE, certain sections of the media and political activists posing as doctors to force the government's hand into bringing in more restrictions.
I also noted that
"It is important to remember that those pushing for greater restrictions have a political agenda, they are using Covid as a cover to push that agenda!"
Right on cue, the GPs (backed by the partisan BMA) have upped the ante.
GPs are threatening to go on strike in protest at the government’s efforts to get them to see patients face to face. The British Medical Association says it has been “left with no alternative.”
It is remarkable that they fail to grasp that their job is to see patients.
The NHS is taking the piss out of those who fund it.
Its role is to protect us, not the other way round!
So long as the government doesn't buckle to this coordinated campaign, once the cases start to fall in the coming weeks these people will be finished!
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
Certain sections of the media, political activists posing as "doctors" and FAKE SAGE fanatics have been ratcheting up the hysteria over the government not implementing Plan B.
They bleat that the rise in cases (even Sajid claims we might hit 100k per day) means that we must impose restrictions in order to save the NHS (an organisation that has now become a religious entity, against which no one dare speak ill).
Disregarding the fact that the NHS is meant to protect us, rather than the other way around, these hysterics ignore a number of fundamental points.
1 The restrictions which they claim are not so onerous (mask wearing, social distancing, work from home etc) do come with a heavy cost; eg loss of income for many, psychological damage etc. The costs have been summarised in a very good article written by Doctor Renee Hoenderkamp.
This from a GP at the daily coal face ⬇️. Thread by @DrHoenderkamp on Thread Reader App https://t.co/Ctf7bBd5ef
— Sue Cook (@SueC00K) October 20, 2021
2 The models used to create fear and panic are BOLLOCKS.
Actual daily Covid hospitalisations vs SAGE scenarios:
— The Spectator (@spectator) October 20, 2021
October 14:
SAGE: 6,714
Actual: 730
October 15:
SAGE: 6,818
Actual: 752
October 16:
SAGE: 6,871
Actual: 743
October 17:
SAGE: 6,897
Actual: 828https://t.co/yhFXRvuyxj
3 Within the next 3 weeks cases will drop like a stone.
I am very confident that cases will start falling soon. I have good reason to be. I estimated >65% of 10-14s had had covid as of a week or so ago. MRC estimates 76%. ~7% are getting infected each week at present (ONS). So that group'll hit 80-90% infected in 1 to 3 weeks.+ https://t.co/EH0fParsWk
— Andrew Lilico (@andrew_lilico) October 21, 2021
4 There is no way that cases will hit 100K!
Let's just say it once more for anyone at the back who wasn't listening. Cases rising from 1/4 of what was predicted to 1/3 of what was predicted is not a reason for extra restrictions. Neither is hospitalisations rising from 1/4 of what was predicted to 1/3 of what was predicted https://t.co/jp6obW1Adl
— Andrew Lilico (@andrew_lilico) October 20, 2021
It is important to remember that those pushing for greater restrictions have a political agenda, they are using Covid as a cover to push that agenda!
Oh, and stand by for the annual Guardian headline saying that the NHS is at breaking point!
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"The difference is one is virtue signalling and one's being honest. Almost no Labour MPs were wearing masks behind closed doors, sans cameras, at their conference, despite cramped, unventilated, hot, sweaty rooms - often with singing.
— Calgie (@christiancalgie) October 19, 2021
At least Tory MPs are consistent. https://t.co/WN2yAEQZPD
A source at the Scottish theatre told the Daily Record that no one has complained about the term “spooky” but they were concerned the word could become problematic in the future.
“There’s been a lot of training and meetings since the [Black Lives Matter] movement and how [National Theatre Scotland] should change,” the source added.
Staff said that the word had been flagged as a racist slur bandied about during the Second World War. American servicemen used “spooky” to refer to black pilots and the word has been controversial in the US as a result.
The word, synonymous with Halloween, was last used by National Theatre Scotland in 2016 for Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol at the Old Kirk in Kirkcaldy. It was used to describe a “spooky location.”
The theatre has said it will “always interrogate language choices” for “historically oppressive connotations.”
The problem with Nanny's "unspeak" dictatorship is that it is BOLLOCKS!
The word "spooky" is NOT used as a racial slur, it is used in connection with ghosts and all manner of things to do with Halloween etc!
— Politics For All (@PoliticsForAlI) October 15, 2021
