Given the restrictions and petty rules of our Nanny state, you would have thought that driving whilst using a mobile, driving without due care and attention, causing an accident due to reckless driving then leaving the scene of an accident before the police turn up was against the law.
Clearly it isn't!
Funny that!
Visit The Orifice of Government Commerce and buy a collector's item.
Visit The Joy of Lard and indulge your lard fantasies.
Show your contempt for Nanny by buying a T shirt or thong from Nanny's Store.
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Celebrate the joy of living with booze. Click and drink!
Why not really indulge yourself, by doing all the things that Nanny really hates? Click on the relevant link to indulge yourselves; Food, Bonking, Toys, Gifts and Flowers, Groceries
Do you mean Harriet Harperson Ken?
ReplyDeletePerhaps the incident, that we won't mention of course, will lead to a similar lane system to the one that used to exist in the USSR; Separate lanes on roads for the sole use of top party officials.
ReplyDeleteNow who mentioned one rule for us and one rule for them?
"I'm Harriet Harperson. You know you can't touch me."
ReplyDelete"I'm the brazen baroness. I make the law. What I did was only an oversight, like forgetting to pay a congestion charge."
"The poorest (s)he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest (s)he."
- Col Thomas Rainsborough (17thC)
I was a prefect at school, and when I threw a bucket of water from an upstairs window, perfectly nailing the maths teacher with the contents, I was delat with very severely indeed - due to my position of 'responsibility' and the need for me to 'set an example' to others.
ReplyDelete"A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said they were in the process of taking statements from all parties."
ReplyDeleteThe incident concerned happened over 3 months ago. How long does it take to ask simple questions like "why didn't you leave your details at the scene or report it at the nearest police station within 24 hours..."
I'm not a fan of The Wail, but I'm hoping they might be able to push this one enough to take the bitch down at last.
Ah, but you see, the plod deferred interviewing the Deputy Leader of the Labour Party last week because she was otherwise engaged at the Brighton conference (where, by the way, Ken, I presume you were outside the hall waving your "No to Nanny" placard).
ReplyDeleteThe likes of you and me would have been brusquely told to drop whatever we were busy with and attend the police station pronto.
But not "equality for everyone, especially women, and me most of all" Harriet.
I believe our friend George said it best:
ReplyDelete"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"
"How long does it take to ask simple questions?"
ReplyDeleteThat is up there with "Why does it take 24 hours to process a speed camera image but over six months to process CCTV of a known naughty person buying jewellery with a stolen credit card".
Oh, by the way the car was stolen and written off but Nanny was only interested in demanding money with menaces because I could not identify the thief from my holiday location.
The card was removed from my mail box at the same time with the thief caught on a local CCTV camera, which the police did not bother to check.
By the time they had processed the jewellers CCTC the aforementioned scrote was banged up for yet another offence so the CPS decided not to proceed.
The scrote was not further disadvantaged. The shop assistant lost her job. I lost my car.
But all is well for HH.
This clearly illustrates the fact that there is one law for government ministers, and a different law for the rest of us. As has been mentioned, if you or I had done this, the police would have thrown the book at us.
ReplyDelete@Tonk - separate lanes are a-coming: it's intended that a route from the West End to the Olympic stadium will be closed to all except VIPs so that they can be whisked from their hotels to the venue without that irritant of daily life, other road users. Big fines for plebs who stray onto the roads despite said plebs paying for use of roads in UK.
ReplyDeleteHeated discussion on radio the other day with the police, firemen and paramedics claiming the plan hasn't been properly thought through and will pose dangers to members of the public but, hell, so what if a pleb dies in the interests of smoothing the path for Lord C?
(I'm already sick of the Olympics.)
Jay
Jay;
ReplyDeleteI too am sick of the Olympics. This idea of separate roads for the great and good does not surprise me. I asked the question when we first won(sic) the right to hold the event, just how many ordinary people will be able to go and watch the more high profile events? Not many I suspect, mind you, those special lanes of which you speak will be busy when that type of event is on.
I wrote to Ken some time ago about how angry I am by the amount of money some people involved in the delivery of 2012, have made out of it via specially created companies that they own.....
The Chinese, being a dictatorship, ensured that the 2008 Olympics were a brilliant spectacle. Brazil's turn will at least flamboyant, whatever else. Our 2012 effort is more likely to be a chaotic shambles, judging from the ramshackle preparations so far.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said...
ReplyDelete"Tonk - separate lanes are a-coming: it's intended that a route from the West End to the Olympic stadium will be closed to all except VIPs so that they can be whisked from their hotels to the venue without that irritant of daily life, other road users. Big fines for plebs who stray onto the roads despite said plebs paying for use of roads in UK."
What a bloody liberty! Why the hell should these people have priority? This is completely against the original spirit of the games, although these fine principles seems to have long been abandoned, alas.
Don't be silly you plebs. Laws are made to keep you in your place and not for the likes of important Nu Labia drones like Harperson.
ReplyDelete