Just a brief word about the £60M cost of Balls' grandparent website.
The majority of the cost would not have been for development, but for marketing.
Nanny uses our money to promote herself!
Given that a trifling 1500 people have registered, that £60M is clearly money well spent!
Visit The Orifice of Government Commerce and buy a collector's item.
Visit The Joy of Lard and indulge your lard fantasies.
Show your contempt for Nanny by buying a T shirt or thong from Nanny's Store.
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Celebrate the joy of living with booze. Click and drink!
Why not really indulge yourself, by doing all the things that Nanny really hates? Click on the relevant link to indulge yourselves; Food, Bonking, Toys, Gifts and Flowers, Groceries
Gordon and his government remind me of a mad elderly aunt at a wedding with a big box of confetti....The only difference is that in Nanny's case, the big box of confetti that she throws around so freely is our tax pounds.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how many commercial TV and radio stations would go out of business if Nanny stopped her "own brand" marketing.
Enjoy throwing confetti responsibly.
www.confettiaware.co.uk
Search on-line for "Act on confetti throwing."
Hmmm . . . 40,000 pounds per registered user. A smashing success!
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry, but how the f**k does someone manage to spend SIXTY MILLION POUNDS on a website?
ReplyDeleteHow is that actually possible? How do you actually spend SIXTY MILLION POUNDS on something that a single 15-year old can do with a copy of Dreamweaver?
Seriously I'm fascinated by how this budget came to be spent. Sixty million pounds is the amount of money required to salary 600 staff at £50k each for TWO YEARS.
If this story is true then Ed Balls has a lot of explaining to do. Frankly if this is true Balls should be put in prison for defrauding the taxpayer.
Ed Balls has a lot of explaining to do? No - he hasn't, because grandparents often have "strong and sometimes strange opinions" which obviously have to be countered by flinging pots of public money at humourless brainless bureaucrats.
ReplyDeleteNeedless to say, the opinions of Balls and Mrs Balls are always irreproachable.
So no case to answer, M'Lud.