Congratulations to G4S for winning my rarely awarded, yet highly prized, Knobheads of The Millennium Award.
For why?
Have a wee look here on my Olympics site and in Metro, and note especially what I say in the final paragraphs:
"Were the Olympics being run in transparent and open manner the taxpayers (who are paying for this corporate marketing fest) would have the right to look at the contract that G4S has signed for providing security for the Games. Unfortunately the Olympics are not being run in an open and transparent manner, and the contract is not available for public scrutiny.G4S well deserving Knobheads of The Millennium!
Why are the taxpayers, who are funding the Games, not allowed to satisfy themselves that their money has been wisely spent and that contracts signed in their names have been negotiated in their best interests?
As an FCA and experienced fraud investigator I would never advise people to put money into a project/business without them at the very least seeing the contract and reviewing it thoroughly, taking advice from independent finance/legal professionals.
The government would argue that they acted in the interest of taxpayers when reviewing and negotiating the contract with G4S. However, as can be seen from this omnishambles of incompetence, it is clear that the government was not up to the job of looking after taxpayers' interests. "
Visit The Orifice of Government Commerce and buy a collector's item.
Visit The Joy of Lard and indulge your lard fantasies.
Show your contempt for Nanny by buying a T shirt or thong from Nanny's Store.
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
Why not really indulge yourself, by doing all the things that Nanny really hates? Click on the relevant link to indulge yourselves; Food, Bonking, Gifts and Flowers, Groceries
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeehaw!
ReplyDeleteTheresa May, in her statement this morning to the House of Commons, stated that the contract was between LOCOG and G4S when asked about penalty clauses.
Given Group Four's past record in relation to the custodial services section of their business, I was surprised they were given any contracts at all.
If there was a contract between LOCAG and G4S, then there must also be a contract between us and LOCAG; I hope we will be clawing back some money from those that have made vast sums out of London 2012 and the egofest.
Makes you wonder how good they are at running privatised prisons (Belmarsh) which I have always considered to be immoral.
ReplyDeleteG4S have a secret base nearby but everybody knows what and where it is, tossers.
There is, to adapt a quote Shakespeare, something rotten in this state!"
ReplyDeleteThe bastard who runs this company is paid £5 million a year and is now due to appear before a select committee of parliament next week where they will tear him to shreds and bite off his bollocks as they have done with Murdoch and every other 'mate' of theirs. I am angry about this even though I don't care about the olympics sham. it's just another episode where the government assists those who will to rip off the people of the UK. Where's the revolution???????
ReplyDelete