Source Clarkson's Farm
What the actual fuck is this bollocks?
Boycott any company that puts this label on a product!
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
In a world where everything from maths to milk is labelled "racist" by the perpetually offended, the latest entrant into this hall of absurdity is none other than the British countryside itself. A fresh report from the University of Leicester’s Centre for Hate Studies has declared rural England "overwhelmingly white" and in dire need of more halal food to combat supposed "rural racism." If you're scratching your head wondering how rolling hills, sheep farms, and quaint villages could possibly harbour bigotry, you're not alone. This piece of academic virtue-signalling isn't just misguided—it's a laughable attempt to impose urban multiculturalism on areas where it makes zero practical sense. Let's eviscerate this report point by point, exposing its flaws, ignoring real data, and highlighting why demands for halal meat in the sticks are nothing short of ridiculous.
Titled "The Rural Racism Project: Towards an Inclusive Countryside," this report—funded by the Leverhulme Trust and penned by academics like Prof Neil Chakraborti, Amy Clarke, and Prof Corinne Fowler—claims that ethnic minorities face "discomfort" and a "psychological burden" in rural areas because they're "predominantly white spaces." Based on interviews with just 115 people, it argues that traditional pub culture and "monocultural customs" are exclusionary, with microaggressions like staring or name-calling allegedly rampant. The solution? More halal and kosher food options, prayer spaces, and "cultural sensitivity" training for rural businesses. As the report pompously states, "the availability of halal food or spaces for prayer could make a significant difference in whether people feel comfortable visiting the countryside."
Sounds reasonable at first glance? Hardly. This isn't about genuine inclusion; it's about fabricating problems where none exist to justify endless "sustained inclusion efforts." The report frames demographic changes as a "threat to the stable and enduring norm of rural identity" rather than an enrichment, but conveniently ignores that over 90% of rural UK residents are white—because, you know, it's the countryside, not downtown London. Demanding halal meat in villages with populations smaller than a city block is like insisting on vegan options at a steakhouse—impractical and out of touch with market realities.
Let's cut to the chase: This report is built on shaky ground. It relies on "collating anecdotes" from a tiny sample size, shying away from hard data that contradicts its narrative. Government hate crime statistics actually show an inverse relationship between rurality and racist incidents—meaning urban areas have far more problems. Tim Bonner of the Countryside Alliance nails it: "The narrative that rural communities are inherently more racist than urban ones is just nonsense." If racism is "worsening" in the countryside, where's the evidence beyond cherry-picked stories?
Moreover, the halal meat demand reeks of hypocrisy. As critics point out, businesses aren't stupid—they cater to demand. In tiny rural hamlets, there's simply no market for specialised halal butchers, just like you won't find a kosher deli in every corner pub. Imagine flipping the script: A report demanding more pork pies and ale in predominantly Muslim neighbourhoods to make white Brits feel "included." It'd be rightly dismissed as absurd. Yet here, academics are pushing for "thoughtful adaptation" that burdens rural folk with unnecessary changes. Gavin Rice from the Onward think tank sums it up: Calling predominantly white areas racist is unreasonable—would we say the same about "too black" or "too Asian" spaces?
This isn't progress; it's divisive drivel that paints rural residents as backward bigots for simply existing in their own communities. It echoes earlier nonsense from Wildlife and Countryside Link, which branded the countryside a "racist, colonial" white space. As one black farmer put it back in 2024, such claims are "dangerous nonsense."
The internet isn't buying it. On X (formerly Twitter), users have eviscerated the report with sarcasm and common sense. One post quipped, "can we see the data that in his eyes makes the countryside racist its not racist to dislike the way their meat is killed, they are racist by not eating bacon." Another: "How the hell is the countryside racist! 😂" And let's not forget the hypothetical reversals: "Now imagine 'rural India is too brown & needs more full English breakfasts' 🤡🌍" Even BBC presenter Nihal Arthanayake criticised similar claims, saying don't tie the outdoors to "racist colonial legacies."
Daily Sceptic readers piled on, calling for defunding universities and labelling the authors "anti-white racists" and "grifters." One comment: "Let’s see if we can find a study conducted in any predominantly Muslim country that would conclude that there should be more places serving alcohol and pork so that European visitors and residents don’t feel ‘discomfort and burden’?" Spot on—the double standard is glaring.
This report isn't isolated; it's part of a pattern where woke academics weaponise "racism" to erode traditional British culture. From the National Trust's colonial audits to museums warning that countryside paintings evoke "nationalist feelings," it's all about guilt-tripping the majority into self-erasure. Rural England isn't racist—it's rural. Forcing halal meat or prayer rooms ignores economic viability and smacks of cultural imperialism in reverse.
In conclusion, the 'Countryside is Racist' report is peak absurdity: A taxpayer-funded diatribe that invents problems, ignores facts, and demands impractical fixes. It's not about helping minorities—it's about dividing society and justifying more "hate studies" grants. If you love the British countryside as it is, push back against this nonsense. After all, the real exclusion here is of common sense. Share this if you're tired of the woke war on rural life.
Auntie isn't exactly covering herself in glory these days.
She has now decreed that the medieval plague was racist and misogynistic.
She neglects to mention that:
1 Life in medieval Europe was pretty shitty for most people
2 There were, at most, a handful of non white people living in medieval England at that time.
Why let facts get in the way of Auntie's agenda?
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
The Cerberus heatwave is gripping Europe, with reports of tourists collapsing across the continent after a man died in northern Italy on Tuesday.
— Sky News (@SkyNews) July 13, 2023
Read more 🔗 https://t.co/ySkI0c0ohc pic.twitter.com/dqSt04ZAeR
People are happily walking around behind the non sweating Sky News presenter.
This news report is utter fucking bollocks!
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
A bunch of wankers in America have decreed that the word "field" is racist.
The word "field" has been declared to have racist connotations and will no longer be used in the University of Southern California’s school of social work.
It will be removed from the curriculum and academic references such as "field of study" will instead be replaced by the word "practicum".
In a letter explaining the decision the University of Southern California’s school of social work said:
"This change supports anti-racist social work practice by replacing language that would be considered anti-Black or anti-immigrant in favour of inclusive language.
Language can be powerful, and phrases such as ‘going into the field’ or ‘field work’ maybe have connotations for descendants of slavery and immigrant workers that are not benign.”
This is of course deranged bollocks, as white people have also worked in fields ever since farming was invented.
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂At Oscars wearing Pomellato jewelry because it only uses responsible, ethically harvested gold and sustainable diamonds. #Oscars pic.twitter.com/IBfJzM84v2— Jane Seymour Fonda (@Janefonda) February 10, 2020
"For the purpose of this guide, we’ll refer to the vagina as the ‘front hole’ instead of solely using the medical term ‘vagina.’ This is gender-inclusive language."Unsurprisingly Healthline have been ridiculed for this nonsense therefore, unsurprisingly, they have revised their article:
"For the purpose of this guide, we’ve chosen to include alternative words for readers to use for their genitals. For example, some trans men choose to use the words ‘front hole’ or ‘internal genital’ instead of ‘vagina.’
"While many people are sensitive to sexist verbal offences, they may not readily associate sexism with warmth and friendliness.
Unless sexism is understood as having both hostile and benevolent properties, the insidious nature of benevolent sexism will continue to be one of the driving forces behind gender inequality in our society."For good measure, seemingly smiling is also sexist!
"those who displayed a benevolent sexism were considered more approachable, warmer, friendlier and more likely to smile."This would be laughable, if it were not for the fact that good money has been wasted on this shite!
Visit The Joy of Lard and indulge your lard fantasies.
Show your contempt for Nanny by buying a T shirt or thong from Nanny's Store.
www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"
Celebrate the joy of living with booze. Click and drink!
Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts
Why not really indulge yourself, by doing all the things that Nanny really hates? Click on the relevant link to indulge yourselves; Food, Bonking, Gifts and Flowers, Groceries
Those of you with reasonably unaddled brains may well recall that, back in October, I warned you all of Nanny's plans to issue licences to people who wished to smoke.
