In case you didn't know (god, I sound like a health and safety droid) the picture is a fake. It's been 'photoshopped'. Here is the original.
Have I been conned?Ken
I know this might sound like a daft question, but the date on the so-called 'original' is 30th July. I received a copy of the so-called ' fake on 26th July. So how can the 'fake' have been in circulation BEFORE the original was taken? I'm confused!!
Hmmm...curiouser and curiouser. I too first saw the Photoshop job on 26 July. But don't you think the original says 30 June 2003?
Curiouser and curiouser said Alice!Fake or not, it very amusing.Ken
In case you didn't know (god, I sound like a health and safety droid) the picture is a fake. It's been 'photoshopped'. Here is the original.
ReplyDeleteHave I been conned?
ReplyDeleteKen
I know this might sound like a daft question, but the date on the so-called 'original' is 30th July. I received a copy of the so-called ' fake on 26th July. So how can the 'fake' have been in circulation BEFORE the original was taken? I'm confused!!
ReplyDeleteHmmm...curiouser and curiouser. I too first saw the Photoshop job on 26 July. But don't you think the original says 30 June 2003?
ReplyDeleteCuriouser and curiouser said Alice!
ReplyDeleteFake or not, it very amusing.
Ken