Nanny Knows Best

Nanny Knows Best
Dedicated to exposing, and resisting, the all pervasive nanny state that is corroding the way of life and the freedom of the people of Britain.

Thursday, August 08, 2013

Nanny Unbans Cakes



On Tuesday I wrote that Nanny had banned a mother and daughter from selling homemade cakes at the daughter's school, because of health and safety concerns.

It seems that this story and other similar ones have prompted the Food Standards Authority (FSA) to engage its brain and apply some commonsense. My thanks to a loyal reader who pointed me to the  FSA statement that volunteer cooks and charity groups, who occasionally prepare food for community events, are not covered by EU laws that have been invoked to ban people from preparing food on an occasional basis for others to consume.

This means that occasional cooks are no longer need to possess a food hygiene certificate before they are allowed to offer their wares for sale.

As per the Mail:
"There is no rule banning the sale of homemade cakes at school fĂȘtes or other community events."
Nice to see the FSA using some commonsense!


Visit The Orifice of Government Commerce and buy a collector's item.

Visit The Joy of Lard and indulge your lard fantasies.

Show your contempt for Nanny by buying a T shirt or thong from Nanny's Store.

www.nannyknowsbest.com is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts

Why not really indulge yourself, by doing all the things that Nanny really hates? Click on the relevant link to indulge yourselves; Food, Bonking, Gifts and Flowers, Groceries

2 comments:

  1. The FSA may well have shown some commonsense here however, will the schools actually take this on board? I doubt it because I still feel all too many schools have staff that are drunk on their perceived power.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lord of Atlantis12:34 PM

    That is the problem! Too many jobsworths in positions of authority, whose only pleasures seem to be bossing other people about and spoiling their enjoyment! What is the betting that this revised ruling only came about because someone 'high up' didn't like the adverse publicity?

    ReplyDelete