"
The best way to take control over a people and control them utterly is to take a little of their freedom at a time, to erode rights by a thousand tiny and almost imperceptible reductions.
In this way the people will not see those rights and freedoms being removed until past the point at which these changes cannot be reversed."
Adolf Hitler
Wise words indeed!
It is "reassuring" to see that our local councils (those organs of the Nanny state which, as you know, I have such a high "respect" for) are testing out Herr Shickelgruber's ideas at this very minute.
Following on from last week's story about
Poole council using the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (Ripa) to spy on a family, over the non terrorist issue of school catchment areas, it transpires that other local councils have been invoking Ripa for spy missions too.
Were they invoking Ripa to counteract possible terrorist threats?
No!They invoked Ripa, and spied on their voters to investigate petty offences such as dog fouling, under-age smoking and breaches of planning regulations.
Councils and other public bodies are using Ripa (anti terrorist legislation) to spy on people, obtain their telephone records and find out who they are emailing.
Did you know they could do all of that?
In 2007 councils and government departments made 12,494 applications for "directed surveillance", according to figures released by the Office of the Surveillance Commissioner. This was almost double the number for the previous year.
Ironically, applications from police and other law enforcement agencies fell during the same period, to about 19,000. One local government body stated that councils and other public bodies would soon carry out
more surveillance than the police.
That's reassuring isn't it?
Ripa is now being used by councils to spy on otherwise law-abiding people committing minor offences such as; fly-tipping, failing to pick up dog mess and to gather evidence that can be used to instigate fines.
Gosport borough council is currently using Ripa for an undercover investigation into dog fouling. Council officers equipped with digital cameras and binoculars are spying on dog walkers.
Chris Davis, the council's head of internal audit, said without irony:
"
We have strategically placed members of our enforcement team to blend in with the natural environment and observe people walking dogs.
They are using digital cameras to get hard evidence. Dog fouling is a real issue and in this case it is happening close to a leisure facility where children play."
Dog fouling may well be a nuisance, but why is anti terrorist legalisation being used to combat it?
Why are innocent people being spied on by the council?
What controls are in place wrt the data gathered? (None I would warrant!)
When Ripa was passed in 2000, only nine organisations, such as the police and security services, were allowed to use it. That number has risen to 792, including 474 councils.
Whilst councillors can be held to account, and indeed can be voted out of office; Local Government Officers (LOG's), on defined pensions and very generous pay packages, cannot be held to account and are virtually impossible to remove from office.
Do we really want people like that spying on us?
When Ripa and other anti terrorist laws were introduced by our political "masters", we were assured that they would only be used against the "bad guys".
It transpires that we are all now "bad guys".
How did this happen?
1 The politicians lied
2 Politicians are incompetent headline grabbing fools, who don't think things through
3 Politicians ignore the fundamental principle of British law, ie innocent until proven guilty. The reason that we have limits on detention without charge etc is to protect the innocent from being held on false charges. Without that failsafe, we would all be held by the police on the slightest whim.
4 Brown and his ilk are control freaks, who do want to monitor what we do
5 Local councils are worse than worthless
6 It is the nature of councils et al to use all the tools at their disposal, to monitor and control their populations. The more we give them, the more they will use.
Brown and his mob even now are pressing for the police to have the wright to detain someone for 42 days without charge, if they suspect him/her of being a terrorist. How the hell do we know that one day we will not be held for 42 days, without charge, on suspicion of being a terrorist?
The solution?
-These festering sores on our democracy, LGO's et al, brought in en masse by "Nu Labour" should be removed from office in one massive culling operation.
-Ripa needs to be repealed and reworked.
-The 42 days detention rule must be stopped.
-Brown and Labour must be kicked out.
Nu labour and the local councils have marked out a path (by misuse of Ripa) that others, even more repellent people, will follow.
You have been warned!"
The best way to take control over a people and control them utterly is to take a little of their freedom at a time, to erode rights by a thousand tiny and almost imperceptible reductions.
In this way the people will not see those rights and freedoms being removed until past the point at which these changes cannot be reversed."
Adolf Hitler
Oh dear, Nanny really is keen to take the joy out of childhood.
