Nanny Knows Best

Nanny Knows Best
Dedicated to exposing, and resisting, the all pervasive nanny state that is corroding the way of life and the freedom of the people of Britain.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Nanny's Child Catchers From Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

On Monday I noted that Nanny had called for hundreds more vulnerable children a year to be taken into care.

Swift off the mark to heed Nanny's call and to show loyalty to the state was Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council, which has decreed that the three foster children that a couple have been caring for since September (note the couple have been foster parents for over six years) must be removed from their care.

For why?

The couple belong to UKIP.


Nanny received a tip off that the couple belong to UKIP; ie the council uses anonymous informers to spy on people!

Nanny sent her Gestapo around to the couple's house, the Gestapo informed that couple that UKIP was a racist party and that the three children (because they were non British) must be removed from their care.

Factoid: UKIP may well have views on immigration/multiculturalism. However, that does not necessarily make it a racist party.

Factoid: Given that the couple voluntarily fostered the three kids, knowing that they were non British, they can hardly be described as being racists can they?

All of this means nothing to Nanny.

Step forward Joyce Thacker, the council's Director of Children and Young People's Services, who is quoted in the Telegraph:
"We always try to place children in a sensible cultural placement. These children are not UK children and we were not aware of the foster parents having strong political views. There are some strong views in the Ukip party and we have to think of the future of the children.

Also the fact of the matter is I have to look at the children's cultural and ethnic needs. The children have been in care proceedings before and the judge had previously criticised us for not looking after the children's cultural and ethnic needs, and we have had to really take that into consideration with the placement that they were in.

 We have to think about the clear statements on ending multi-culturalism for example. 

These children are from EU migrant backgrounds and Ukip has very clear statements on ending multiculturalism, not having that going forward, and I have to think about how sensitive I am being to those children.
This is of course an abhorrent thing to do and the lesson is clear; if you belong to a party that the state disapproves of, the state will take your children away from you.

Councils are the enemies of the people.

Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council's decision must be overturned, and its network of informers and spies dismantled, if the British people are to once again regain their freedom!

Visit The Orifice of Government Commerce and buy a collector's item.

Visit The Joy of Lard and indulge your lard fantasies.

Show your contempt for Nanny by buying a T shirt or thong from Nanny's Store. is brought to you by "The Living Brand"

Visit Oh So Swedish Swedish arts and handicrafts

Why not really indulge yourself, by doing all the things that Nanny really hates? Click on the relevant link to indulge yourselves; Food, Bonking, Gifts and Flowers, Groceries


  1. Councils are the enemies of the people.
    They are common purpose only just in disguise.
    They are the european union no longer in disguise.

  2. Anonymous1:19 PM

    Stinks of common purpose trash.

  3. Anonymous3:05 PM

    The children were apparently with the couple for 8 weeks and not for 6 years as you stated, but nevertheless this was a terrible decision to take them away from a caring home.

    I really do not know why people affiliate themselves with any political party. Support is a two way thing, and politicians only give their support when there is something in it for themselves.
    I refer to the silence from the Rotherham UKIP candidate, Jane Collins, who has been put forward for the November 29th by-election.

    The only politician that seems to be making the right noises is Ed Miliband, who is of course, a complete cunt.

    1. Anonymous8:25 PM

      I am Jane's agent and we are both involved in this matter.
      Our prime concern is for the safety and welfare of the children. We did not choose the day that these children were removed RMBC did. All we are trying to do is to expose the enemies of the people.

    2. Anonymous10:33 PM

      I don’t believe you.

      I don’t understand why Jane Collins’ political agent would want to remain anonymous here, and I don’t believe that the children’s safety and welfare is your primary concern.
      I don’t believe that you are vigorously fighting on behalf of this couple who have publicly voiced their support for UKIP.

      I believe that your main concern is to minimize the damage that may have been caused to your party by it being labelled as racist less than a week before a by-election.

  4. Tonk.8:07 PM


  5. This was full width - front page on some editions of Telegraph Sat 24th - Now (21.00) the 'on-line'lead story -
    Michael Gove has condemned a council which removed three children from their foster parents because of their membership of the UK Independence Party.
    Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council has announced it will now carry out an urgent review of the case, after the husband and wife, who have been fostering for nearly seven years, said they were made to feel like criminals when a social worker told them their views on immigration made them unsuitable carers for the three ethnic minority children.
    Mr Gove, who heads the Government department responsible for children's services and who was himself adopted as a child, described Rotherham's decision as "indefensible".
    He said social workers had made "the wrong decision in the wrong way for the wrong reasons" and that he would be personally investigating and exploring steps to "deal with" the situation.

  6. I first read 1984 in about 1975 thinking 'it could never happen here'. To make things worse, that monstrous cow Joyce Thacker probably thinks that she is doing the right thing.

  7. Anonymous12:11 PM

    Er, being an insensitive cynic (I've worked long and hard to get this way so I try to keep in practice) but if these poor children are "not UK children" and require fostering, then why are they being fostered here instead of whichever European country they originated in? Or is it another case of Europe sending their incompetent, defective or just criminal adults here and rather than send them and their offspring packing we get to keep them all 'in the style they've grown accustomed too' when said 'adults' show they are incompetent parents? Or is it another case of parents sending their kids here so as to get an anchor (re: Romanians)?

    And no, I don't belong to UKIP, BNP, the masons or Blockbuster video, I just pay taxes and wonder at these things.

    Oh, and if anyone is accepted to train as, let alone qualifies and works as a social worker - I think they should automatically be entered on the child protection register as a danger to children (and possibly the judicious use of piano wire and lampposts).

    Just Sayin'

  8. Anonymous10:48 AM

    Social Workers = Social Fascists !